versus

Let's agree upon one thing Most of the qualitative comments below the video and in the chat were negative.

Yeah ,right! Of how ready it is this was an eye opener. https://youtu.be/MtGsltlAdVI?t=1948 Look at all the comments. Eye candy screenshots remind me of those lose weight, gain muscle BEFORE-AFTER images. Its the videos that count. Not so easy to choose the "right angle" there.

As always never flying through clouds. Clouds are relatively flat, lacking height and thickness, Just my thoughts.

Don't know why but with every screenshot or video from within or near the clouds they become dissolved, further apart, showing gaps. Could you post a video of entering a solid overcast when you go from seeing the clouds nearing you to being totally immersed in complete whiteness with no gaps or ground visible. I've seen every video you posted and when plane is about to enter the clouds you do some wierd stuff with camera angles constantly shifting POV as if you are trying to conceal the fact that total whiteout is still not possible.

I think big improvement to weather depiction in sim would be forecast based modelling instead of report based modelling. If you take forecast based modelling you have all the data for 14 days for the whole world and much more detailed regarding the weather parameters than metar based modelling. If this modelling is implemented the weather can be truly dynamic with fronts moving and skies clearing up gradually, storms developing ,etc.. The only downside to this is that weather representation is not 100% faithful to real time. But, then, who cares, when prognostic data is so good that a 3 days forecast is almost completely accurate let alone the forecast for the duration of the flight and the zone you can cover in average time flight. Do you have any plans of implementing this...?