Jump to content

AshenOne

1st class
  • Posts

    27
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by AshenOne

  1. As far as I understand, the stage of building a dynamic atmosphere (for real calculations) is completed or is at the final stage. But personally I don't see much difference between the colors of the sky with 1.08 or now. I do not know, maybe I misunderstood you, but I thought that the sky will be calculated from real data, and therefore will have the most approximate view of reality. If you haven't used this "technology" yet, say so.

  2. 1 hour ago, domae001 said:

    Before I got into flightsimming I would never have imagined how upset people could get over the colours of the sky...

    I look at the evening sky every day from my home office window and I have seen so many different skies that I wouldn't dare declare one of them "THE" exact evening sky. How much it changes from one day to the other is rather impressive and most likely very difficult to recreate in a PC simulation environment. Just my 2 cents.

    That is why I pointed several times at the evening winter sky on a clear day, that on these screenshots and shown.

  3. image.png.57b97473cd8ec8805e5c9888db31b9fc.pngimage.thumb.png.47f2dc1d26ecf8b7666939aef7b326c6.png

    I know that you do the colors of the sky by real calculations, but as a resident of the Moscow region I can say (and not only on my own behalf, but from familiar photographers and sky lovers) that the evening sky in winter certainly does not look like in the screenshot. Yes, it's VIP, but I just simply suggest first of all to listen to the opinions of other people (what you don't like how it turned out before when I've been writing about the color of the sky) or to see the SKY in person!

    NO camera will not give real colors, and the eyes of all people see everything differently, but the truth will remain true. The evening sky in winter doesn't look like the sky from Mars (sorry if it's hard for you to listen). It looks exactly like the pictures above.

    P.S. I do not want to hear about the types of cameras and the characteristics of the photoreceptor of the eye. It's your job to do what you want, but I don't understand why you think the blue-pistachio-gray color of the sky is real.This sky is, but not without clouds and haze.The clean clear the sky blue (here is here already debate - foolish).

  4. 3 hours ago, Captain Kitten said:

    You can't compare reality with photographs in any way. What bugs are you talking about? I have used maxxfx with all versions of XEnviro. 

    Okay, dispute is useless.I just expressed my opinion (although,to be honest, I heard it from other people as well).

    And the bugs were related to performance and sometimes crashes.(don't say my hands are crooked)

  5. 1 hour ago, Captain Kitten said:

    I disagree. But you can always add MaxxEffects or ReShade to saturize as much as you want.

    So and is done, but there is(were in 1.08-09) some bugs with these programs.fon-nebo2.jpg87724_1280_1024.jpg

    By me,natural sky looks more blue(like 1.06 sky).

    Cheers

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Please read the Terms of Use